Most Popular

National Features >

  • Phoenix New Times

    Pen Pal

    The nation's oldest Death Row inmate probably won't ever be executed. But he sure loves to write letters.

    By Paul Rubin

  • Miami New Times

    Budget Ballin'

    South Florida's lawless exotic rental car industry keeps rolling.

    By Gus Garcia-Roberts

  • Houston Press

    Crime Doesn't Pay Back

    In Texas, restitution for victims is nothing but a state-sanctioned sham.

    By Chris Vogel

  • Seattle Weekly

    Hot and Frothy

    If you thought Seattle couldn't fetishize coffee any more, you haven't been to a "cupping" yet.

    By Jonathan Kauffman

Anthony Mots was driving the firetruck that killed Aaron Becerra. Afterward, Mots’ brothers in the Kansas City, Kansas, Fire Department rallied to defend him

Continued from page 3

Published on July 15, 2008 at 11:42am

At trial, Novak surprised Cohen by testifying that he'd wanted Mots to get tested and was upset when he found out, weeks later, that Mots hadn't been tested. Cohen says Novak also testified that, on the night of the accident, Novak had called in the Kansas Highway Patrol so that there would be no allegations of conflict of interest at the scene, and that Novak expected Highway Patrol employees to test Mots. Mots must not have been tested because of "confusion" at the accident scene, Novak testified.

But Novak's story was contradicted when Kansas Highway Patrolman Mike Gruber, a witness for the defense, testified that he was told on the scene that the Unified Government would test Mots.

"That's where the claim of confusion fell apart," Cohen tells The Pitch. Gruber's testimony was supposed to help make the Unified Government's case but instead weakened it. "Novak's saying, 'Gee, people just assumed. We assumed they'd test him.' Gruber's saying, 'No, somebody with the government either told me they'd test him or told one of my troopers, and then my trooper reported it to me.... We did not simply assume the government would test him. We were told.'

"That's not confusion," Cohen says. "That's deception."

The jurors apparently believed that the firefighters were standing up for one of their own.

"I have no problem with Tony Mots. I think he ended up being the scapegoat," says a male juror. "There were policies and procedures that the Kansas City, Kansas, fire department didn't follow through on. One thing that really swayed the jury was this mandatory policy of drug testing that fell through the cracks."

He recalls firefighters testifying, "We don't go out to hurt people. We go out to help. Tony Mots was the first guy out of the truck and to the Becerra vehicle before other help arrived ... if this [Mot's alleged impairment] was really going on, we wouldn't want him on our crew. We wouldn't want to be fighting fires with him.

"When guys work together the way those people do," the male juror continues, "when their lives depend on each other, they're going to protect one another, no question about it."

But one female juror says the firefighters' testimony lacked heart. "They were in a position, you know, damned if you do and damned if you don't," she says. "This is their job. This is the Unified Government on trial. That's their employer. They were in a position where they had to say what they had to say. I don't think the defendant's lawyer was able to get them to be wholehearted about anything. He got as much out of them as he could."

The jury heard testimony from accident reconstruction experts and witnesses from the accident scene. Pages of drawings and dozens of photos of the intersection at 18th Street and Central were passed in front of them. Several witnesses reported that Mots could not have avoided hitting Becerra's car. But one witness, Kenneth Lee, a railroad engineer who was 55 at the time of the accident, told a different story.

Lee said he wanted to turn left off Central but became impatient with a car in front of him, driven by an older man who was slow to make the turn. Lee pulled into the through lane instead and stopped because the light had turned red. Lee watched in his rearview mirror as the firetruck came up fast behind him. The truck pulled around Lee and the older man's cars and entered the intersection going the wrong way, into oncoming traffic. Lee said the truck didn't hit the brakes until after running into Becerra.

Lee told his version of events to the emergency response crew at the scene of the accident, then drove to the office of the Kansas Highway Patrol the next day to report it again, to make sure his account was on the record.

The testimony of Mike Macek, the older man who had been in the left-turn lane, backed up Lee's report — that the firetruck went through a red light without braking.

To his deposition, Lee added a statement: "The firetruck driver, in my opinion, is guilty of vehicular homicide and negligence because he came through the intersection with no regard for public safety, and he took a life, when all he had to do was slow up and see what was coming through the intersection."

Mots seemed quiet and remorseful in the courtroom, the female juror says. But, she adds, "In my mind, you can feel bad and you can look sad, but are you feeling sad for the victims or sad for yourself?... He said he was sorry, but is it, 'I'm sorry I'm in this mess' or 'I'm sorry you lost your loved one,' you know?"

The jury was also influenced by the testimony of pain experts who described what Becerra would have suffered.

"The thing that weighed so heavily was the fact that the young man was at the hospital, cut open because of all the swelling, and they left him like that for six or seven days, couldn't even close him up," the male juror says. "That was hard to listen to."

« Previous Page   1   2   3   4   5   Next Page »

The Pitch Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff
Backpage.com